Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Fox News Poll: Most rate the economy negatively, including half of Republicans

Published

on



NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

It’s less than five months until the midterm elections and voters are not happy with what’s in their wallets.

Advertisement

Only 12% say they are getting ahead financially, most think the economy is in bad shape, more than half think President Donald Trump’s policies benefit people who have money, and their outlook on the economy is negative. 

That’s according to a new Fox News poll that finds the president’s numbers have declined since last year. 

Some 59% of voters feel pessimistic about the economy, worse by 4 points compared to last June (55%). That’s a stark contrast from the bullish views during Trump’s first term, when 57% felt optimistic (June 2019). 

Advertisement

FOX NEWS POLL: VOTERS SEE AI REGULATION AS URGENT, RANK SAFEGUARDS AHEAD OF INNOVATION

Forty-four percent say they’re falling behind financially. That’s more than felt that way last year by 8 points (36% falling behind) and by 3 points compared to June 2024 (41%).

One in four, 26%, rates the economy positively, better by 3 points since last month and generally in line with views this year — but still below last June’s 31% positive marks. Around three-quarters consistently rate the economy negatively (73%).

Advertisement

FOX NEWS POLL: ‘RESILIENT DISCONTENT’ DEFINES THE US MOOD AT 250TH ANNIVERSARY

Big picture, 37% are satisfied with the direction of the country. That’s mostly unchanged since March, but down from 44% last July. Even with the 7-point decline since last summer, satisfaction is higher today than what it was for most of former President Joe Biden’s term.

Those satisfaction ratings closely match Trump’s job performance, as his approval stands at 39%. That’s unchanged since last month, but down 7 points compared to 46% approval last June. His lowest approval for either term is 38% in October 2017. 

Advertisement

Twenty percent think Trump’s economic policies benefit everyone, while a 54% majority says they help people with more money than they have, and 15% say they help «no one.» The share saying the president’s policies help everyone is down from 31% in 2019 (Trump), 27% in 2023 (Biden), and 23% in 2015 (Obama).

Opinions on the economy are largely based on party identification. Among Republicans, the biggest share says Trump’s policies help everyone (42%), half say they’re holding steady financially (49%), half rate economic conditions positively (50%), and two-thirds feel optimistic (66%). 

It’s the opposite among Democrats: 81% feel pessimistic about the economy, 91% rate it negatively, more than half say they’re falling behind (55%), and 71% think the president’s policies help people with more money.

Advertisement

Approval of the president is near record lows among some of his key constituencies, sitting a single point above his all-time floor among men (43%), White voters (44%), White evangelical Christians (61%), and Republicans (81%). His support among White men without a college degree stands at 50%, only 2 points ahead of his low-water mark.

The 23% approving of Trump’s handling of gas prices marks a rare moment of consensus — voters across the board are unhappy with the president — as majorities of Democrats (95%), independents (88%), and Republicans (53%) disapprove.

On the economy overall, 31% approve of the job Trump is doing, up from a record low 29% in May. A year ago, 40% approved. While a majority of Republicans approve, most Democrats and independents disapprove.

Advertisement

On immigration, 43% approve, the lowest of Trump’s second term, but still his best issue. 

These ratings are driven, at least in part, by 51% thinking his immigration enforcement has gone too far. 

In addition, views on the immigration role of local governments have flipped. Currently, 53% say local governments should control immigration enforcement in their communities, while 46% believe cooperation with ICE should be required. Last year, it was the reverse: 51% favored requiring ICE cooperation and 45% preferred local control.

Advertisement

Poll-pourri

Trust in the federal government stands at a low of 25%. That’s down from 32% in both 2025 and 2024. The previous low was 31% in 2023. Trust stood at a high of 54% in 2002, but hasn’t hit 40% since 2012. 

During the last year of the Biden administration, 44% of Democrats distrusted the government (2024), and that increased to 73% in 2025 and 83% this year. 

Among Republicans, more than 6 in 10 (63%) don’t trust the government, up 15 points compared to last summer (48%), but down from 85% two years ago. Currently, 57% of MAGA Republicans and 73% of non-MAGA Republicans lack faith in Uncle Sam. 

Advertisement

Distrust has held fairly steady among independents recently: 80% today vs. 80% in 2025 and 72% in 2024. 

Six in 10 voters believe the government spends too little time combating fraud in federal programs, and another 66% say recent efforts have been ineffective. 

While Democrats (55%) and Republicans (63%) agree the government isn’t doing enough to stop fraud, they disagree on recent performance: a majority of Republicans (56%) say efforts to prevent fraud have been effective, while most Democrats say the reverse (83% ineffective). Views among independents are the most critical, as they think the government isn’t doing enough (67%) and what it has done has been ineffective (78%).

Advertisement

Conducted June 12-15, 2026, under the direction of Beacon Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R), this Fox News survey includes interviews with a sample of 1,002 registered voters randomly selected from a national voter file. Respondents spoke with live interviewers on landlines (101) and cellphones (644) or completed the survey online after receiving a text (257). Results based on the full sample have a margin of sampling error of ±3 percentage points. Sampling error for results among subgroups is higher. In addition to sampling error, question wording and order can influence results. Weights are generally applied to age, race, education, and area variables to ensure the demographics are representative of the registered voter population. Sources for developing weight targets include the most recent American Community Survey, Fox News Voter Analysis, and voter file data.

Fox News’ Victoria Balara contributed to this report.

Advertisement

fox news poll, politics, republicans, democratic party, economy, midterm elections, donald trump

Advertisement

INTERNACIONAL

Con concesiones a Irán, Donald Trump firmó por adelantado un polémico acuerdo para terminar la guerra en Oriente Medio

Published

on


washington. afp, ap y efe

Estados Unidos e Irán adelantaron este miércoles la firma electrónica de un polémico acuerdo para cesar la guerra en Oriente Medio y abrir el estrecho de Ormuz, según informaron dos funcionarios estadounidenses al sitio online Axios, habitualmente bien informado.

Advertisement

La prensa francesa, por su parte, reveló que el presidente Donald Trump había estampado su firma digital en el memorando de entendimiento desde el Palacio de Versalles, donde participó de una cena en su honor dada por su anfitrión, Emmanuel Macron.

Según lo acordado en días anteriores por Washington y Teherán, la firma del acuerdo tendría lugar en Suiza este viernes, pero un diplomático de un país mediador y una segunda fuente familiarizada con el asunto informaron a Axios que ya se habían mantenido conversaciones sobre la firma con anterioridad.

De acuerdo con ese informante diplomático, las conversaciones para acelerar el calendario tenían como objetivo abrir el estrecho antes del viernes. El pacto entró en vigor este miércoles.

Advertisement

Otro factor pudo haber sido la presión política sobre la Casa Blanca para que publicara el texto del memorando de entendimiento, el cual -luego de que el gobierno lo presentara a la prensa- comenzó a recibir fuertes críticas incluso desde el partido Republicano cuyos líderes aseguraron que Trump cedía a muchas de las exigencias planteadas por Teherán, con lo que empeoró la situación que se vivía antes de la guerra.

Este miércoles, Estados Unidos difundió el pacto de 14 puntos acordado con Irán luego de que el borrador de ese mismo texto hubiese sido difundido más temprano por la agencia Bloomberg y la cadena Al Arabiya.

El acuerdo difundido confirma las sospechas previas: Irán obtiene muchas ventajas que antes no tenia y cederá por su lado en dos asuntos esenciales: la primera será reabrir y limpiar de minas el estrecho de Ormuz en un plazo de 30 días y, la segunda, no desarrollar “nunca” armas nucleares, algo que sin embargo Irán viene declarando desde hace décadas.

Advertisement

Pero el texto acordado deja para más adelante los puntos más controvertidos por los que EE.UU. e Israel iniciaron la guerra el 28 de febrero: el memorando no precisa qué se hará con el uranio enriquecido iraní, no habla de la limitación de los misiles iraníes y tampoco incluye una palabra sobre los reclamos para que el régimen deje de apoyar financiera y militarmente a sus socios regionales como el grupo rebelde de los hutíes en Yemen.

La no inclusión de estos aspectos en el anterior acuerdo nuclear bajo Obama, del que Trump sacó a su país en 2018, fue una de las razones por las que el republicano definió aquel pacto como “el peor de la historia”. Sin embargo, este acuerdo firmado por Trump atrae críticas aún más duras en Washington y ya es un revés para Israel, que fue dejado al margen en la negociación.

A cambio de la firma iraní, el pacto establece que Estados Unidos le permitirá vender su petróleo sin restricciones y que Estados Unidos conseguiría al menos 300.000 millones de dólares para reconstruir Irán después de la guerra y trabajaría para poner fin a todas las sanciones estadounidenses y de la ONU impuestas a Teherán.

Advertisement

El acuerdo exige además el fin inmediato de todos los combates en Líbano entre Israel y Hezbollah. Esa es una de las partes más delicadas del pacto porque Israel dice que seguirá defendiéndose y ocupando franjas de Líbano. Irán ha dicho que, en virtud del memorando, Israel debe retirarse, aunque las versiones conocidas del texto no mencionan ninguna retirada.

Cumbre. Trump durante un mensaje en la reunión del G7 que concluyó este miércoles en Evian, Francia (Reuters).

Desde ahora, tras la firma del memorando, ambas partes iniciarán 60 días de negociaciones sobre un acuerdo final que el gobierno de Trump insiste en que impedirá que Irán desarrolle alguna vez un arma nuclear. Pero entre tanto, Irán parece estar obteniendo beneficios por adelantado mientras hace pocas concesiones. Gran parte del acuerdo restablecería el statu quo anterior a la guerra, incluido el fin de las hostilidades y la reapertura del estrecho, cuyo cierre creó una crisis energética histórica.

Este miércoles, Trump dijo desde la cumbre del G7 que el pacto cerrado evita la “catástrofe económica” que se habría producido en caso de continuar el conflicto.

“No quería ver una catástrofe económica. Si esto hubiera continuado, esto es lo que habría pasado”, sostuvo. “Si no tuviéramos este acuerdo, podríamos haber lanzado bombas durante otras dos semanas, tres, cuatro, dos años. El estrecho de Ormuz nunca se abriría”, añadió el líder republicano.

Advertisement

Horas antes, no obstante, había advertido que “no es definitivo” el memorando de entendimiento cerrado con Irán y que, si Teherán “no se comporta”, se retomarán los bombardeos.

El acuerdo supone un gran alivio para la economía mundial: la reapertura del estrecho de Ormuz, por donde pasa una quinta parte del petróleo global, bajará los precios del crudo que han golpeado en todo el planeta. El cierre de esa estratégica via encareció muchos productos básicos, incluida la comida.

Irán dejó salir a algunos buques que pagaron peajes, algo nunca hecho antes en el estrecho, que se encuentra en aguas territoriales de Irán y Omán y desde hace tiempo se ha considerado una vía marítima internacional. Posteriormente, Estados Unidos brindó apoyo militar para sacar a otros petroleros, pero el tráfico por el estrecho aun no se acercó a los niveles previos a la guerra iniciada en febrero.

Advertisement

Fuentes: agencias AFP, EFE y AP

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Finland’s parliament votes to lift decades-old ban on nuclear weapons in historic NATO defense shift

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Finland’s parliament on Wednesday voted to lift a decades-old ban on nuclear weapons, approving a major defense policy shift aimed at aligning the country more closely with North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) deterrence strategy.

Advertisement

Defense Minister Antti Häkkänen said a strong majority backed the amendment to the Nuclear Energy Act, calling it a «historic reform» that strengthens Finland’s security and that of the alliance.

«The Parliament approved the amendment to the Nuclear Energy Act with a strong 2/3 majority,» Häkkänen said in a post on X. «This historic reform strengthens the security of Finland and of NATO as a whole.

In April 2023, Finland joined NATO in response to Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, ending decades of military non-alignment. The move, aimed at securing Finland’s collective defense, roughly doubled NATO’s border with Russia.

Advertisement

ANOTHER NATO ALLY SIGNS ONTO EUROPEAN NUCLEAR UMBRELLA AS CONTINENT BOOSTS SELF-DEFENSE

EU Commissioner for Defence and Space, Lithuanian Andrius Kubilius (R) and Finnish Defence Minister Antti Haekkaenen (L) attend a press conference at the Ministry of Defence in Helsinki, Finland, on Sept. 26, 2025. (MARKKU ULANDER/Lehtikuva/AFP via Getty Images)

«The overall nuclear weapons policy has been one of the most challenging issues in the Ministry of Defence during this parliamentary term. Years of study, discussions with nuclear-weapon states and other allies, and assessments of how Finland’s security can best be strengthened in NATO,» Häkkänen said.

Advertisement

The measure repeals provisions in Finland’s 1987 Nuclear Energy Act that banned the import, production, possession and detonation of nuclear explosives.

If enacted, the legislation would allow nuclear weapons to be transported, supplied or possessed in Finland where the country’s military defense requires it.

FINLAND’S FOREIGN MINISTER SAYS UKRAINE ‘IS NOW HOLDING THE CARDS’ AS RUSSIA SIGNALS TALKS

Advertisement
NATO emblem displayed on a blue background.

The NATO emblem is displayed during the NATO Summit held in Vilnius, Lithuania, on July 12, 2023. (Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto)

According to Euro News, 125 deputies backed the government proposal, 61 voted against it and 13 abstained.

The bill now moves to the president for final approval.

«I thank all the Members of Parliament who supported our legislative proposal for their strong backing,» Häkkänen said. «Thank you to the defense administration professionals at home and abroad for their high expertise also in this project.»

Advertisement

Despite the bill passing, the proposal has drawn criticism from opposition lawmakers, who warned it could escalate tensions, make Finland a potential primary target, and break from regional norms, noting that several neighboring countries have rejected hosting or permitting nuclear weapons.

Finnish Army

Commander of the Finnish Army Lieutenant General Pasi Valimaki addresses Finnish conscript soldiers after a military exercise at Pori Brigade in Niinisalo, Finland, Dec. 9, 2025. (Anne Kauranen/Reuters)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The introduction of the proposed law also provoked a strong reaction from Russia last March, according to Reuters.

Advertisement

«This is a statement that leads to an escalation ​of tensions on the European continent,» Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.

«This statement adds to Finland’s vulnerability, a ​vulnerability provoked by the actions of the Finnish authorities. The fact is that by deploying ⁠nuclear weapons on its territory, Finland is beginning to threaten us. And if Finland threatens us, we take appropriate measures.»

Reuters contributed to this report.

Advertisement



nato, legislation, national security, nuclear proliferation, reform, europe

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Trump switches support in Oklahoma congressional race as formerly endorsed pastor candidate suspends campaign

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump withdrew his endorsement of Oklahoma GOP congressional candidate Jackson Lahmeyer on Wednesday, and threw his support behind Republican rival Mark Tedford, a dramatic reversal that came shortly before Lahmeyer publicly announced he was suspending his campaign.

Advertisement

Lahmeyer told Fox News Digital, however, that he made the decision to end his campaign the night before and informed his wife and campaign team before Trump’s endorsement switch.

«I made my decision to drop out of the race last night,» Lahmeyer told Fox News Digital. «I decided to choose my wife over my ambition. I informed my wife about my decision late last night and then my campaign team early this morning. My decision did not take place because of the decision of POTUS this afternoon.»

AP results showed Tedford finishing first with 32.2% and Lahmeyer second with 25.9%, advancing both Republicans to a runoff election to succeed Rep. Kevin Hern, who is running for the U.S. Senate.

Advertisement

TRUMP DROPS MARJORIE TAYLOR GREENE ENDORSEMENT, CALLS HER A ‘RANTING LUNATIC,’ HINTS AT BACKING PRIMARY RIVAL

Republican pastor Jackson Lahmeyer formally suspended his campaign for House District OK-01 Wednesday via X, mere minutes after President Donald Trump withdrew his endorsement on Truth Social. (Ballotpedia)

Trump had previously endorsed Lahmeyer as a «MAGA Warrior» and longtime ally, making Wednesday’s endorsement switch one of the more notable reversals of the 2026 midterm cycle.

Advertisement

At approximately 2:23 p.m., Trump announced on Truth Social that he was backing Tedford.

«I greatly appreciate Jackson Lahmeyer’s hard work under difficult circumstances — He has always been with me, and I will always be with him,» Trump wrote. «But, when it comes to the current Congressional race for Oklahoma’s 1st Congressional District, I will be supporting America First Patriot, Mark Tedford.»

SNUBBED BY TRUMP, GOP CANDIDATES FIGHTING FOR RE-ELECTION ACT LIKE THEY HAVE HIS BACKING ANYWAY

Advertisement
U.S. President Donald Trump talking with French President Emmanuel Macron at Hotel Royal Evian.

President Donald Trump attends a bilateral meeting at the Hotel Royal Évian in Évian-les-Bains, France, Monday, during the Group of 7 summit. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The president described Tedford as «Pro Trump and MAGA all the way» and said the state lawmaker had his «Complete and Total Endorsement.»

At approximately 2:32 p.m., Lahmeyer announced on X that he was suspending his campaign.

«After prayerful consideration with my wife, Kendra, and my team over the last twenty four hours, I’ve made the difficult decision to suspend my campaign for Congress,» Lahmeyer said.

Advertisement

«I do not want to be a distraction to my family, my church, and the great people of Oklahoma’s 1st Congressional District, who deserve a strong conservative voice representing them in Washington.»

Fox News Digital reached out to Lahmeyer, Tedford and the White House for comment. A White House official referred Fox News Digital to Trump’s Truth Social statement and did not provide additional comment.

INSIDE STEFANIK’S EXIT AND HOW THE TRUMP ENDORSEMENT THAT NEVER CAME WAS ‘BIGGEST PIECE’ OF THE ‘PUZZLE’

Advertisement
U.S. Capitol building

Lahmeyer was seeking to represent Oklahoma’s 1st Congressional District in Washington, D.C. (Celal Gunes/Anadolu via Getty Images, File)

Trump’s decision marked a sharp turn from his earlier endorsement of Lahmeyer, whom he praised before Oklahoma’s June 16 primary.

The endorsement reversal came after a turbulent stretch for Lahmeyer’s campaign. The Daily Mail published reports regarding Lahmeyer’s communications with former Miss Oklahoma USA Caitlin Simmons Key. 

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

Lahmeyer later acknowledged that he had crossed «a boundary line through text messaging» while disputing what he described as a misleading characterization of the situation.

Neither president Trump nor the White House publicly explained the reason for the endorsement change. Tedford is now positioned as the likely Republican nominee in the strongly GOP district.

Advertisement

midterm elections, republicans elections, donald trump, republicans, congress, house of representatives, politics

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias