Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

Record antisemitic incidents in Canada fuel criticism of Carney government response

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Canadian government led by Prime Minister Mark Carney is facing renewed criticism that it is not doing enough to curb antisemitism as a new report shows record numbers of hate crimes against the nation’s Jewish population. 

Advertisement

On Monday, human rights organization B’nai Brith Canada’s League for Human Rights released a report showing that 6,800 antisemitic incidents took place in the country in 2025, representing a 9.4% increase over 2024. On average, this represented 18.6 incidents a day, and was the «highest volume» the group has recorded since it began tracking incidents.

Just last week, Canada’s Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights released a report on the rise of antisemitism in Canada following the Hamas attacks of Oct. 7, 2023. The committee issued 22 recommendations for the Canadian government to address the tide of anti-Jewish hate.

FROM AUSCHWITZ, HOLOCAUST SURVIVOR ISSUES URGENT WARNING OVER RISING ANTISEMITISM IN CANADA

Advertisement

The Montreal Torah Center is shown in Hampstead, Quebec, on Nov. 14, 2023, amid concerns over a rise in antisemitic acts, including attacks on Jewish schools and a synagogue in Montreal. (Alexis Aubin/AFP via Getty Images)

The recommendations span the gamut of expanding research into hate crime data, improving security funding, addressing the display of hate symbols, expanding social media and digital literacy, and increasing educational resources for professionals teachers and students.

In one recommendation, the report addressed the prime minister directly, asking that he reinstate the position of a Special Envoy on Preserving Holocaust Remembrance and Combating Antisemitism. Carney eliminated this position in February along with the combating Islamophobia position, integrating them into a different office. His office did not respond to Fox News Digital’s inquiry about whether he intends to follow the recommendation.

Advertisement

While some welcomed the report, several Jewish Canadians expressed concern whether it accurately identified drivers of antisemitism.

The report does not mention Islamic extremism, and only occasionally mentions anti-Zionist fervor, often describing it using the words of other institutions and respondents.

VIOLENT MOB ATTACKS PRO-ISRAEL GATHERING IN TORONTO DAYS AFTER MAYOR’S ‘GENOCIDE IN GAZA’ REMARKS

Advertisement
Masked pro-Palestinian protesters storm pro-Israel event in Toronto breaking glass and attacking attendees

Masked pro-Palestinian protesters stormed a pro-Israel event in Toronto, breaking glass and allegedly attacking attendees on Nov. 5, 2025. (Jonathan Karten)

«It is deeply troubling and bewildering that the Senate report doesn’t even reference religious radicalism as a problem,» Rabbi Elchanan Poupko, host of The Jewish World podcast, told Fox News Digital.

«The reluctance to identify the radicals is itself evidence of ignorance and bias,» he said. «By their silence, politicians are implying that they think the broad Muslim community is supportive of the radicals and therefore fear alienating that community by denouncing the radicals. Truth be told, it is often that moderate Muslims are the first who suffer at the hands of radical elements.»

Poupko added that it «is notoriously difficult to quantify with any degree of certainty what percentage of Canadian Muslims support the radicals,» but said «it is certainly far from a majority.»

Advertisement

CANADA’S CARNEY UNDER PRESSURE TO ACT AFTER SYNAGOGUES SHOT AT IN LATEST ANTISEMITIC INCIDENTS

Anti-Israel protesters gathered outside Beth Avraham Yoseph synagogue in Toronto

Anti-Israel protesters gather outside the Beth Avraham Yoseph synagogue in Toronto on March 7, 2024. The synagogue was one of three targeted in shootings during the first week of March 2024. (Mert Alper Dervis/Anadolu)

The Canadian Muslim Public Affairs Council raised concerns of its own about the Senate’s recommendations. Though it «reaffirm[ed] that combating antisemitism is essential to protecting all communities in Canada,» the group stated on X that «certain recommendations… raise serious concerns about potential impacts on Charter-protected freedoms, including protest and expression» and suggested «efforts to address hate» should «not inadvertently limit civil rights, restrict lawful advocacy or disproportionately marginalize communities.»

Aviva Klompas, CEO and co-founder of Boundless Israel, told Fox News Digital that she applauds the report’s recommendations of «creating safety zones around religious institutions and community spaces, strengthening hate crime enforcement and education,» but does not «think it fully accounts for the multiple dimensions driving this immediate surge, including Islamic extremism and the ways anti-Zionism is used as a cover to target Jews.»

Advertisement

There are concerns about whether the Senate’s recommendations are sufficient to address the current climate of anti-Jewish hate. Poupko said, «Antisemitism is too generic a term to describe what is now the problem,» adding that the «‘old’ solutions, like education, police training and Holocaust awareness are clearly insufficient to meet the challenge.»

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney speaking at a podium

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney faces criticism over the rise in antisemitic attacks after shootings at synagogues in the Toronto area earlier this year. (Renaud Philippe/Bloomberg via Getty Images/Nick Lachance/Toronto Star via Getty Images)

Klompas says she «appreciate[s] that a plan is being put into place» but is concerned «that it doesn’t meet the urgency of the moment. Jewish schools have been shot at, synagogues repeatedly targeted and Jewish-owned businesses vandalized.»

She questioned whether anyone would «gamble on a new task force or education training programs to keep your family and friends safe at a moment when they are actively under attack?»

Advertisement

Ian McLeod, senior media relations advisor at the Canadian Department of Justice, told Fox News Digital, «The Government of Canada is taking concrete action to counter hate in all its forms, including antisemitism, and reinforce that our society will not tolerate anyone being made to feel afraid because of who they are, how they worship or where they gather.» The spokesperson noted that many of the Senate’s recommendations «reflect these actions.»

Temple Emanu-El synagogue building in Toronto with police tape outside

Temple Emanu-El in Toronto was shot at on March 3, 2026. No injuries were reported. (Nick Lachance/Toronto Star via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Among the initiatives McLeod said were already underway is Canada’s Action Plan on Combating Hate (CAPCH), launched in September 2024, «which brings new and existing initiatives together to foster greater coordination and collaboration among federal organizations to prevent and address hate.»  

Advertisement

During the same year, McLeod said the Canadian government «announced over $273 million to support community safety, improve responses to hate crimes, help victims, and counter radicalization.»



anti semitism, canada, hate crime, mark carney

INTERNACIONAL

‘America First’ immigration overhaul bill would codify Trump’s campaign promises once and for all

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

FIRST ON FOX: President Donald Trump’s ‘America First’ immigration overhaul would be codified into law under a House Republican bill that would significantly narrow legal immigration pathways by shifting the system toward high-skilled workers, eliminating most family sponsorship categories and ending the diversity visa lottery.

Advertisement

Immigration — both illegal and legal — remains a contentious topic in Washington, with Democrats pushing to expand pathways for migrants to obtain citizenship, while Trump and his Republican allies are seeking to restrict migration, including proposals such as ending birthright citizenship.

Rep. Barry Moore, R-Ala., introduced the Americans First Immigration Act, which would amend several key provisions in the Immigration and Nationality Act, in an effort to «putting American citizens first.»

«My bill draws a hard line – the days of putting illegals, random diversity lotteries and foreign labor ahead of American workers are over,» Moore said in a statement to Fox News Digital. «Our immigration system should serve the American people, not undercut them, and that means selecting individuals who will strengthen our economy, respect our laws, and share our values.»

Advertisement

FEDERAL JUDGE THROWS OUT BIDEN ADMIN PROGRAM TO LEGALIZE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT SPOUSES OF US CITIZENS

Rep. Barry Moore, R-Ala., participates in the House Judiciary Committee organizing meeting in the Rayburn House Office Building on Feb. 1, 2023. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)

The 70-page bill seeks to codify many of the actions already taken by the Trump administration to tighten legal immigration pathways. In December 2025, President Donald Trump paused the green card lottery program in the wake of two shootings on college campuses, and last September, Trump signed an executive order placing restrictions on the issuance of H1B1 visas, a work visa offered for specialty occupations.

Advertisement

«If you want to come to the United States, you should earn it through merit, not diversity lotteries or loopholes. The Americans First Immigration Act restores fairness and accountability by protecting American jobs, prioritizing the nuclear family and ensuring that every immigrant admitted is prepared to contribute and succeed,» Moore told Fox News Digital.

While Moore’s bill seeks to end the diversity lottery visa, it includes a provision to ensure that the allotment of visas for religious workers, equal to 3,000 a year, is preserved.

President Donald Trump signing an executive order in the Oval Office at the White House

President Donald Trump signed two executive orders in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 19, 2025. The orders established the «Trump Gold Card» visa program and introduced a $100,000 fee for H-1B visas. The «Trump Gold Card» allows foreign nationals permanent residency and a pathway to U.S. citizenship for a $1 million investment in the United States. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

‘SHAMEFUL’: LEGAL IMMIGRANTS FACE UPHILL BATTLE AMID ONGOING BORDER CRISIS

Advertisement

Julie Kirchner, a senior advisor at the America First Policy Institute, supports Moore’s bill, particularly the measure to eliminate lottery visas.

«The Visa Lottery has a long, documented history of fraud and national security concerns and should be abolished. Under a merit-based, America First system, any immigrant would have to demonstrate their skills, ability to assimilate, and how they will contribute to the U.S.,» Kirchner told Fox News Digital.

One of the other provisions in Moore’s bill seeks to put «American workers first» by overhauling the current employment-based immigration visa program and replacing it with a points-based merit system. Under the new points-based system, applicants are ranked and will receive points on factors such as their level of English proficiency, education, their level of compensation, military service and age. All applicants must have a salary that is at least 200% above the median wage of the state they’ll reside in, and they must meet English proficiency requirements.

Advertisement

REPORTER’S NOTEBOOK: GOP PUSHES ELECTION SECURITY BILL DESPITE SLIM ODDS, AS TRUMP PRESSURE LOOMS

Employers must also prove that they «took good faith steps» in recruiting American workers for the job offered to the foreign worker for equal compensation. The legislation also requires employers to share with the government the name and contact information of American workers who were offered the job and their offered wage. The Department of Labor will oversee and investigate compliance.

And migrants offered a visa are required to sign a petition pledging they support the U.S. Constitution and its values. The pledge also includes a requirement to disavow political groups or social groups that partake in honor killings, female infanticide or genital mutilation.

Advertisement
A person holding a passport and visa documents

The Trump administration says foreign student visa vetting will be a continued process rather than a one-time check. (iStock)

«Ideally the government has the information in advance to bar these people from immigrating to the U.S.,» Kirchner said. «However, if a newly-arrived immigrant engages in behavior that demonstrates the statements he made to our immigration agencies were false, that can become the basis for deportation or denaturalization.»

The act would also curtail family-sponsored immigration to only be accessible to spouses of U.S. citizens, minor children, spouses of green card holders and children of green card holders. Parents, siblings, and adult children of U.S. citizens are barred.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement

«What the bill does is eliminate the ability of extended family members to get a preference under the law,» Kirchner said. «Extended family members can still apply – but they would have to do so based on their own skills, merit, and ability to assimilate.»

congress, legislation, immigration, bills, republicans, politics

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Russia built global recruitment pipeline targeting vulnerable migrants for Ukraine war: report

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Russia has built what human rights investigators describe as a global pipeline recruiting vulnerable foreign nationals into its war against Ukraine, drawing tens of thousands from more than 130 countries through what groups allege are coercive, deceptive and in some cases trafficking-like practices.

Advertisement

After suffering major battlefield losses and seeking to avoid another politically risky domestic mobilization, Moscow institutionalized a worldwide recruitment system targeting some of the world’s most vulnerable populations to sustain its war machine, a new report by the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), Truth Hounds and the Kazakhstan International Bureau for Human Rights argues. 

Russia has recruited at least 27,000 foreign nationals since February 2022 from countries across Central and South Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America, according to the report. Ukrainian authorities cited in the report project that Russia could recruit another 18,500 foreign nationals in 2026 alone, which would mark the highest annual total since the full-scale invasion began.

AS WAR LOSSES NEAR 2 MILLION, RUSSIA ACCUSED OF TRAFFICKING FOREIGN RECRUITS FROM AFRICA, ASIA

Advertisement

Nationals of African countries sit in a section of a detention center holding foreign fighters captured while serving in the Russian army on the Ukrainian front in western Ukraine on Nov. 26, 2025. (Genya Savilov/AFP via Getty Images)

«This report highlights something fundamental: that the use of foreign fighters by Russia is neither a marginal nor a spontaneous phenomenon. Russia has built a global recruitment system that deliberately targets the most vulnerable populations — undocumented migrants, detainees, precarious workers, or even foreign students — across dozens of countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America,» said Alexis Deswaef, president of the International Federation for Human Rights. 

«Many of these men knew in some capacity what they were signing up for. But some were also deceived or coerced. But in all cases, it is a State that has instrumentalised them as part of its war machine and sent them to the most dangerous positions on the frontline.»

Advertisement

The report’s central allegation is that Russia’s recruitment apparatus extends far beyond traditional mercenary networks and instead functions as a state-enabled global system that exploits poverty, legal vulnerability and migration insecurity.

Investigators say recruitment evolved from relying primarily on ideologically motivated volunteers early in the war to a broader institutionalized model by mid-2023, after Russia expanded legal eligibility for foreign nationals, eased language and residency requirements, and offered citizenship and financial incentives in exchange for service.

NORTH KOREAN LABORERS DESCRIBE BRUTAL FORCED LABOR IN RUSSIA: «WORKING LIKE A COW, EARNING NOTHING»

Advertisement
Nationals of African countries watching television in a detention center in western Ukraine

Nationals of African countries watch television in a detention center in western Ukraine holding foreign fighters captured while serving with Russian forces on the Ukrainian front on Nov. 26, 2025. (Genya Savilov/AFP via Getty Images)

In some cases, according to the report, migrants inside Russia were allegedly pressured to enlist through raids, detention threats, document confiscation, fabricated criminal charges and abuse. Outside Russia, recruits were often allegedly lured through promises of civilian jobs, noncombat positions or pathways to Europe, only to be routed into military contracts they often could not read.

Of 16 prisoners of war interviewed for the report, 13 said they were told they would not be required to fight, but were later deployed to frontline positions, often within weeks.

The report also alleges many foreign recruits were funneled into so-called «meat assaults» — high-risk frontal attacks associated with severe casualty rates. Ukrainian estimates cited in the report say at least 3,388 foreign fighters have been killed, with some estimates suggesting one in five recruits may not survive deployment.

Advertisement

HEGSETH WARNS RUSSIA AS SIGNS POINT TO MOSCOW SHARING INTEL WITH IRAN 

A Russian service member standing next to a mobile recruitment center in Rostov-on-Don

A Russian service member stands next to a mobile recruitment center for military service under contract in Rostov-on-Don, Russia, Sept. 17, 2022. (Sergey Pivovarov/Reuters)

«Despite the fact that many states are taking measures to curb recruitment, and although Russia claims it is no longer recruiting citizens from certain countries, the predatory recruitment continues. Ukrainian authorities predict that in 2026 Russia will engage more 18,500 foreign nationals, marking the highest annual figure since 2022,» said Maria Tomak, associated researcher and advocacy expert at Truth Hounds.

«This underscores the continued relevance of our report. Our primary objective remains clear: to halt recruitment and to compel Russia to repatriate those already recruited.»

Advertisement

The report stops short of claiming every foreign fighter was trafficked, noting some enlisted voluntarily for financial gain, but concludes there are reasonable grounds to believe at least some cases meet international definitions of trafficking in persons through deception, coercion and exploitation.

For investigators, the broader concern is that Russia’s war effort may now depend in part on a transnational manpower pipeline that weaponizes global inequality, drawing economically desperate men from around the world into one of Europe’s deadliest conflicts.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Advertisement
Chechen soldiers in Ukraine

Russian and Chechen soldiers in a devastated Mariupol neighborhood close to the Azovstal frontline.  (Maximilian Clarke/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)

The report calls on governments, international organizations and Ukraine’s allies to crack down on recruitment networks, pressure Moscow diplomatically and push for repatriation of foreign nationals already caught in Russia’s military system.

Fox News Digital reached out to the Russian Embassy in Washington, D.C., and Russia’s Defense Ministry for comment but did not receive a response.

Advertisement



russia, conflicts, ukraine, russia investigation, human rights united nations, recruitment, wars

Advertisement
Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Lobos solitarios, violencia política y resentimiento: qué advierten los expertos después del nuevo intento de ataque a Donald Trump

Published

on


Armado con pistolas y cuchillos, Cole Allen, ingeniero de 31 años, saltó los controles de seguridad para llegar al salón donde estaba el presidente Donald Trump y sus principales funcionarios con el objetivo de asesinarlos, según la acusación de los fiscales contra este hombre que resultó detenido antes de que pudiera lograr su cometido, en medio de la cena anual de periodistas acreditados en la Casa Blanca.

No tenía antecedentes penales, había comprado las armas legalmente y sus conocidos, sobre todo sus compañeros de grupos cristianos, dicen que jamás hubieran pensado que Allen, que trabajaba como tutor de alumnos del secundario, era capaz de cometer acto semejante.

Advertisement

Antes del ataque, el hombre envió a sus familiares un manifiesto en el que intentaba explicar los motivos. “Soy ciudadano de los Estados Unidos de América. Lo que hacen mis representantes me representa a mí. Y ya no estoy dispuesto a permitir que un pedófilo, violador y traidor manche mis manos con sus crímenes”, escribió en aparente referencia a Trump y el caso Epstein. En el documento, Allen intentó refutar posibles observaciones sobre su accionar que le podrían hacer desde el cristianismo.

Es el tercer episodio de violencia que sufre Trump desde hace casi dos años, luego del ataque en Buttler que terminó con una herida en la oreja, y el arresto de otro hombre que buscó dispararle cuando jugaba al golf en Florida. Ninguno de los atacantes tenía antecedentes y nadie sospechaba de una radicalización.

Expertos en violencia política consultados por Clarín como Brian Levin, fundador del Centro para el Estudio del Odio y el Extremismo, señalan que “recientemente hemos observado un cambio, con una creciente diversificación de los delincuentes que planean o ejecutan actos de violencia política en Estados Unidos”.

Advertisement

Diversificación ideológica

Levin advirtió que “estamos presenciando una diversificación ideológica y una creciente influencia de resentimientos personales en relación con los ataques. Además, en todo el espectro ideológico, vemos más individuos que actúan en solitario, muchos de los cuales experimentan angustia psicológica o emocional situacional. Si bien pueden actuar solos, a menudo forman parte de un ecosistema en línea hostil que refuerza los prejuicios y etiqueta a los enemigos como objetivos legítimos de agresión”.

Kurt Braddock, profesor de Comunicación Pública en American University y especialista en estrategias persuasivas de grupos extremistas, señaló a Clarín que “parece haber un repunte en quienes actúan motivados por la animosidad contra figuras y objetivos de derecha. Cabe aclarar, sin embargo, que en los últimos años, los ataques y los intentos de ataque de la izquierda han sido mucho menos frecuentes que los de la derecha”.

Advertisement

Según una investigación del año pasado del Center for Estrategic and International Studies (CSIS) “en los últimos años, Estados Unidos ha experimentado un aumento en el número de atentados y complots terroristas de izquierdas, aunque dicha violencia ha aumentado desde niveles muy bajos y sigue siendo mucho menor que los niveles históricos de violencia perpetrada por atacantes de derechas y yihadistas”.

El experto cita un estudio del “Bridging Divides Initiatives” de la Universidad de Princeton, que señala que “el riesgo de violencia política se intensificó el año pasado y continuará empeorando en 2026”, según dijo la directora Shannon Hiller. El reporte advierte que la violencia y las amenazas contra funcionarios y políticos crecen en años electorales. Y señala además que 2026 está en una “peligrosa trayectoria”.

Donald Trump, durante la conferencia de prensa luego del intento de ataque del sábado. Foto: REUTERS

Donald Trump, una figura «polarizante»

Braddock señala que “no existe un perfil estándar de atacante político. Personas de todos los ámbitos, ideologías, religiones y orígenes pueden ser susceptibles a participar en actos de violencia, aunque la decisión de hacerlo es muy poco común, a pesar de los intentos de ataque de alto perfil como el que vimos en la Cena de Corresponsales de la Casa Blanca”.

Advertisement

Sin embargo, el experto advierte que “Donald Trump es una figura increíblemente polarizante. Desde 2015, ha utilizado una retórica y promovido políticas que algunas personas han interpretado como ataques a sus derechos fundamentales y a su humanidad”.

Y agrega que “este ataque en particular parece haber estado motivado, en parte, por la supuesta relación de Trump con Jeffrey Epstein. Los potenciales atacantes perciben agravios que creen que deben resolverse mediante la violencia. Desafortunadamente, quienes intentan estos ataques parecen creer que son la mejor manera de abordar sus agravios”.

“Creo que es indiscutible que la creciente polarización en Estados Unidos ha llevado a un mayor uso de una retórica que alude al uso de la violencia como medio viable para resolver diferencias políticas. Una vez más, la extrema derecha ha superado a la extrema izquierda en este tipo de lenguaje, pero la izquierda no ha sido inmune a él”, señala.

Advertisement

Para Erica Frantz, profesora asociada de Ciencias Políticas en Michigan State University, experta en política autoritaria y democratización, “Estados Unidos está experimentando un repunte de la violencia política. Si bien no carece de precedentes históricos, es motivo de preocupación, ya que es síntoma de una democracia debilitada”.

“La insurrección del Capitolio en 2021 fue el detonante de la actual ola de violencia, perpetrada por simpatizantes de derecha de Trump. Dado que Trump y otros miembros de la derecha no condenaron la violencia —e incluso, en cierto modo, la avalaron al indultar a muchos de los perpetradores—, no sorprende que la situación se esté descontrolando”, dijo a Clarín.

“Los extremistas de ambos lados del espectro político ven ahora la violencia como una forma de expresar sus ideas. Para poner fin a este ciclo devastador, es fundamental que nuestros líderes políticos intenten unir a la ciudadanía estadounidense mediante mensajes de unidad, solidaridad y compasión”, agregó.

Advertisement

El Polarization Research Lab recopiló datos tras el asesinato en septiembre de 2025 del activista conservador Charlie Kirk. Concluyó que menos del 1 por ciento de los estadounidenses consideraba aceptable el asesinato por razones partidistas. «Este rechazo casi total demuestra que no existe una base significativa para la violencia política en Estados Unidos», según su informe.

Sin embargo, sus cifras también indican que más del 90 por ciento de los estadounidenses temen a la violencia política. Casi un tercio dijo que no quería colocar un cartel político en su jardín o una calcomanía en su auto porque temía ser atacado. El reporte señala que, de hecho, este miedo podría ser el efecto colateral de la violencia dirigida contra los líderes del país porque ha fomentado un clima en el que incluso muchos estadounidenses comunes ya no creen que puedan expresar sus ideas políticas y desacuerdos de forma segura.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias