Connect with us

INTERNACIONAL

House avoids unprecedented four-member expulsion week as Swalwell and Gonzales resign instead

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

It may have been possible to bequeath this as «expulsion week.»

Advertisement

Instead, this might be «resignation week.»

The House has only expelled six Members in the history of the republic. But it was possible as recently as Monday that the House was primed to wrestle with a mind-boggling four expulsions.

It takes a two-thirds vote to expel a Member. The House last expelled one of its own in late 2023: former Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.). Before that, you have to go back to 2002 when the House kicked out late Rep. Jim Traficant (D-Ohio).

Advertisement

5TH ACCUSER COMES FORWARD AGAINST REP ERIC SWALWELL AHEAD OF EXPECTED RESIGNATION

Here was the chopping block:

Calls to expel former Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) piled up after reports surfaced that he sexually assaulted a former aide and several other women. Swalwell initially said he would fight the allegations. Then he dropped his bid to become governor of California after a host of once close allies abandoned their support. Swalwell has now resigned, avoiding the ignominious scene of an expulsion.

Advertisement

Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., appeared on MS NOW 26 times and on CNN 24 times in 2026 alone, according to the Media Research Center.  (Ronaldo Bolaños/Getty Images)

Then there was former Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas). At first, Gonzales denied an affair with an aide who committed suicide by setting herself on fire. Gonzales was locked in a tough primary runoff against Republican Congressional candidate Brandon Herrera. But after pressure, Gonzales finally dropped out of the runoff and isn’t standing for re-election. However, Gonzales intended to stay on until his term expired on January 3 next year. But now Gonzales is out the door, too.

TWO DEMOCRATIC REPS CALL FOR SWALWELL TO EXIT CONGRESS AS CONTROVERSY SWIRLS AROUND HIS BID FOR CA GOVERNOR

Advertisement

So two down, two to go.

This is where things grow complicated.

Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D-Fla.) could face expulsion soon. In late March, the House Ethics Committee held a rare «trial,» declaring she improperly obtained an astonishing $5 million in COVID relief funds. The Ethics panel will likely recommend a punishment for Cherfilus-McCormick next week. The full House doesn’t have to consider or adhere to the prescribed discipline. The congresswoman proclaims her innocence. She faces a criminal trial in Florida in February 2027.

Advertisement

WHY ERIC SWALWELL WAS FORCED TO QUIT CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR’S RACE AFTER SEXUAL MISCONDUCT ALLEGATIONS

«The facts are indisputable at this point and so I believe it will be the consensus of this body that she should be expelled,» forecast House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.).

Split of Mike Johnson and Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said lawmakers should expel Rep. Sheila Cherfilius-McCormick, D-Fla., after a House ethics panel found her guilty of more than 25 ethics violations. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images; Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Rep. Greg Stuebe (R-Fla.) filed a resolution to bounce Cherfilus-McCormick from the body a few months ago. 

Advertisement

And for the Republicans, there’s Rep. Cory Mills (R-Fla.). Mills is accused of «stolen valor» and exaggeration of his military record. But what triggered the current expulsion push is an allegation that the congressman struck his girlfriend in early 2025. A judge imposed a restraining order against Mills. However, police never charged the congressman. The Ethics Committee is also investigating whether he violated federal campaign rules. But the formal ethics probe of the Florida Republican isn’t as far along as the Cherfilus-McCormick inquiry.

SWALWELL RESIGNATION COLLIDES WITH CHINA-LINKED SCANDAL AS CRITICS DEMAND FILE RELEASE

Johnson is mindful of that fact.

Advertisement

«With regard to Mills, I’m not sure the status of the Ethics Committee investigation and that’s one of the things I’ll be looking into today,» said Johnson.

Four troubled Members. Two Democrats and two Republicans. It was that parity which may have primed the House to take the unprecedented step of expelling those four Members before Swalwell and Gonzales announced their resignations. But a push to expel Cherfiulus-McCormick and not Mills creates a host of problems in the House.

GONZALES HIT WITH EXPULSION VOTE THREAT AHEAD OF EXPECTED RESIGNATION

Advertisement

It’s about the math.

The House swore-in Rep. Clay Fuller (R-Ga.) on Monday night. Fuller won a special election last week to succeed former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) who resigned. That GOP gain is likely offset by an anticipated victory by Democratic Congressional candidate Analilia Mejia in a Thursday special election in New Jersey. This is a Democratic seat which has been vacant since New Jersey Gov. and former Congresswoman Mikie Sherill (D) resigned from the House last fall.

Clay Fuller and President Donald Trump

Republican congressional candidate Clay Fuller, left, speaks next to President Donald Trump, during a visit to the Coosa Steel Corporation in Rome, Georgia, Feb. 19, 2026.  (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)

With Swalwell and Gonzales out and Fuller in, the current breakdown is 431 Members: 217 Republicans and 213 Democrats. Rep. Kevin Kiley (I-Calif.) dropped his affiliation with the GOP. The addition of Fuller and presumed win by Meija would make the breakdown 217 to 214 and one independent – with one vacancy, covering 432 Members. After the Swalwell and Gonzales resignations, the remaining open seat is a solidly Republican district in northern California, long held by late Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-Calif.). He died in January.

Advertisement

ERIC SWALWELL WAS CABLE NEWS STAR FOR YEARS BEFORE RAPID FALL FROM GRACE

But what happens if the House moves against Cherfilus-McCormick and not Mills? That creates an imbalance between the parties – something which was lost when the potential expulsion of four Members was on the table.

«What about this issue of parity,» yours truly asked House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.).

Advertisement

«The issue of parity hasn’t been something that we’ve had a conversation about. We’ve been working through what’s in front of us today and that’s what we’re going to continue to do,» replied Jeffries.

LAWMAKERS PUT EXPULSION THREATS ATOP HOUSE AGENDA AS RETURN SETS UP HIGH-STAKES WEEK

I followed up.

Advertisement

«But isn’t that a concern, though, if they take action against Cherfilus-McCormick? Her ethics process is further along than Mr. Mills,» I asked.

«The ethics process is still incomplete and we’ll see what the Ethics Committee has to recommend next week,» replied Jeffries.

‘SMART DECISION’: SWALWELL’S RESIGNATION SPURS PRAISE FROM BOTH PARTIES AFTER BOMBSHELL ALLEGATIONS EMERGE

Advertisement

That’s in reference to the upcoming ethics panel meeting, recommending punishment for the Florida Democrat.

It was one thing if the House may have bounced four Members, two Republicans and two Democrats, all at once. But it’s dicier now that Gonzales and Swalwell stepped aside. It’s further complicated considering the uneven status of the ethics inquiries regarding Cherfilus-McCormick and Mills.

Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick pointing up

Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, D-Fla., speaks after being sworn in during a ceremony in the Broward County Commission chambers in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on Jan. 27, 2025.  (Joe Cavaretta/South Florida Sun Sentinel/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

It seems that Congress is now in a period of establishing new precedents on a regular basis. A record-breaking government shutdown – only superseded by another record-breaking government shutdown. In addition, the House is experiencing a dramatic increase in the raw number of «censures» which it doles out to Members. Censure is the second-highest mode of punishment in the House, just below expulsion.

Advertisement

JONATHAN TURLEY: ERIC SWALWELL’S ENABLERS KNEW THE TRUTH — AND PROTECTED HIM ANYWAY

The House censured late Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) in late 2010. Prior to that, the House last reprimanded late Reps. Gerry Studds (D-Mass.) and Daniel Crane (R-Ill.) in 1983. But since 2021, the House has censured five Members: Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) – when he served in the House – Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), former Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) and Rep. Al Green (D-Texas).

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) recently characterized the censure explosion as the «political» weaponization of the ethics process.

Advertisement

It’s possible the House might not take any immediate action regarding Cherfilus-McCormick and Mills. Lawmakers from both sides may be more willing to expel one of their own – and maybe take one for the team on their side – if a similar outcome is guaranteed across the aisle.

SWALWELL’S FALL FROM GRACE SPARKS DEMOCRAT RUSH TO RETURN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS AMID SCRUTINY

With such a tight majority, Republicans may not want to cede power to Democrats if the House expels a GOP Member as they try to cling to the majority. By the same token, it’s doubtful Democrats are willing to absorb a hit when they are within sneezing distance of the majority – if they don’t see a political equilibrium and document consequences for the Republican majority.

Advertisement

Moreover, tracking where the votes lie for disciplinary action is nearly impossible. What further complicates this is whether any expulsion motion actually comes to a true, up/down vote. There are often motions «to table» or kill any resolution to impose discipline against a Member. The same with motions «to refer» or dispatch allegations against a Member to the Ethics Committee for additional scrutiny. For instance, the Ethics panel is all but done probing Cherfilus-McCormick and is investigating Mills. So it’s unclear what would happen with any possible motion «to refer.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

And let’s be frank: some lawmakers either really want to be on the record voting to discipline one of their colleagues or want no part of it at all. Resolutions to sit in judgment of a colleague is one of the hardest votes lawmakers take. Right up with a vote to go to war. That’s why some prefer the political fig leaf of a «motion to refer» or «motion to table» to an actual up/down vote to punish one of their own.

Advertisement

So this could have been «expulsion week» on Capitol Hill. It’s certainly «resignation week.» And if there’s no other disciplinary action, some lawmakers will be resigned to that outcome.

politics, us, eric swalwell, congress, house of representatives politics, mike johnson

INTERNACIONAL

WATCH: Platner doesn’t apologize to Purple Heart recipient, voters when confronted on post mocking soldier

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

FIRST ON FOX: SULLIVAN, ME – Democratic Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner declined to apologize both to voters and a Purple Heart recipient when asked by Fox News Digital about a deleted Reddit post where he said the wounded soldier «didn’t deserve to live.»

Advertisement

Platner did not respond at first when asked outside a market near his home whether he regrets making the post, which Fox News Digital reported earlier this week showed him mocking a video of Pfc. Ted Daniels taken during a clash with Taliban fighters in 2012 that ended in Daniels being shot four times and being awarded a Purple Heart. 

«I did four tours in the infantry, any attempt to say that I disrespect veterans is slanderous and offensive,» Platner said when asked follow-up questions about what he would say to any Maine voters who were offended by his post and if he should apologize to Daniels.

«Do you think you owe him an apology?» Fox News Digital asked again.

Advertisement

UNEARTHED POSTS SHOW DEM SENATE HOPEFUL PRAISING VULGAR GRAFFITI, MAKING CRUDE PORTA POTTY ADMISSION

Fox News Digital spoke to Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner near his home in Maine on Saturday about his recent controversies over his resurfaced Reddit posts, including a comment mocking a Purple Heart U.S. soldier. (Fox News Digital)

«Do you know how many of my friends have Purple Hearts, do you know how many of my friends got wounded?» Platner responded, before adding, «yeah, a lot of them, thank you.»

Advertisement

Platner, a U.S. Marine Corps veteran, sparked significant outrage online this week over the resurfaced Reddit post critics have said shows a lack of respect for his fellow soldiers.

«This video never gets old,» Platner posted in June 2019 using the Reddit account «P-Hustle,» which he has acknowledged owning, in reference to a viral video from the helmet Daniels was wearing while taking enemy fire.

WATCH: COLLINS RIPS MAINE CHALLENGER PLATNER OVER RESURFACED REDDIT POST MOCKING WOUNDED US SOLDIER

Advertisement
Graham Platner standing and smiling in a formal setting

Maine Democratic Sen. candidate Graham Platner is facing renewed criticism over his deleted Reddit history. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

«Dumb motherf—–  didn’t deserve to live. At least his stupidity and fat a– wheezing are available for all future infantrymen to witness and hold in contempt. Poor marksmanship on the Taliban’s part is the only reason this mouthbreather made it home. He managed to make every possible s— decision possible when it comes to small unit combat.» 

Rob O’Neill, the U.S. Navy SEAL who is credited with killing Usama bin Laden, was one of many veterans to speak out in response to the post. 

«Mr. Platner was way out of line talking about a soldier that way,» O’Neill  told Fox News Digital about the controversy on Thursday.

Advertisement

PLATNER’S BRUTAL ATTACKS ON ARMY SOLDIERS AS ‘FAT, LAZY’ REVEALED IN RESURFACED POSTS

Graham Platner campaigns in race against Sen. Susan Collins of Maine

Graham Platner, the Democrats’ presumptive Senate nominee in Maine, holds an energy event in Ellsworth, Maine on Monday May 11, 2026. (Paul Steinhauser/Fox News)

«This is completely barbaric,» O’Neill added. «I don’t understand. If you swear an oath to the country, it doesn’t even matter what the politics are. Every single time you fight it’s for the man next to you, it’s for the person next to you. Politics goes out the window. And to wish ill on someone like that under fire is just, you know, like I said, it is the opposite of everything I’ve ever been raised to believe.» 

Platner has previously leaned into his struggle with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to explain the numerous incendiary social media posts that have surfaced since he announced his Senate run.

Advertisement

«For those of you who have read these things and been offended, have read these things and seen someone that you don’t recognize, I am deeply sorry,» Platner said in October before the post about Daniels, and other posts disparaging the military, were public.

«I’m sorry for this. Just know that it’s not reflective at all of who I am. I don’t want you to judge me on the dumbest thing I ever wrote on the internet. I would prefer if people could judge me on the person I am today.»

Daniels himself reacted to the post, telling Fox Business, «People like this don’t say stuff like this to my face.»

Advertisement

«It’s online, and that right there tells me, Graham, you’re a coward.»

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Platner became the Democrats’ presumptive nominee after his rival for the nomination, two-term Gov. Janet Mills, ended her campaign last month after trailing Platner in polling and fundraising.

Advertisement

The Democratic Senate Primary in Maine will be held on June 9, where Platner will appear on the ballot alongside Democrat David Costello to earn the right to face off against incumbent Republican Sen. Susan Collins.

fox news digital, fox news, marines, veterans

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Graves enfrentamientos entre manifestantes y policías en La Paz: palos, piedras y gases lacrimógenos en otra jornada de caos

Published

on



Pocas horas después de que el presidente Rodrigo Paz llamara una vez más al diálogo para bajar la tensión y frenar las protestas que desde hace tres semanas acorralan al gobierno y sobre todo a la población de varias ciudades de Bolivia, un grupo de manifestantes volvió a marchar al centro de La Paz, donde la policía los dispersó con gases lacrimógenos, en una nueva batalla similar a la que ya se vivió aquí varios días la semana pasada.

En el día 25 de movilizaciones, sectores campesinos y sindicales marcharon desde la vecina ciudad de El Alto hacia el centro de La Paz, pese al gigantesco cordón policial que impedía el paso alrededor de las sedes del Ejecutivo y del Legislativo, para exigir la renuncia del presidente.

Advertisement

Mientras gran parte del país pide al gobierno que busque una solución pacífica a la crisis política y social, otra vez las cuadras que rodean la histórica Plaza Murillo y la sede del Gobierno volvieron a ser por un rato escenario de guerra.

Mineros, campesinos y trabajadores de fábrica, muchos de ellos liderados por la poderosa Central Obrera Boliviana (COB), comenzaron a partir de las 9 de mañana desde El Alto, a unos 20 kilómetros de La Paz, desafiando los pedidos del gobierno de desescalar el conflicto que ya genera un enorme malestar en gran parte de la población que sufre la escasez de bienes esenciales debido a los cortes de ruta.

Con banderas de Bolivia y la Whipala tradicional de los pueblos originarios, los manifestantes -los mismos que desde comienzos de mayo bloquean el camino desde El Alto e impiden el paso de camiones con combustible, alimentos y oxígeno para los hospitales- desfilaron por calles y avenidas de La Paz, sede de los poderes Ejecutivo y Legislativo.

Advertisement

Aunque la marcha estaba anunciada desde el fin de semana, muchos aquí confiaban en que las protestas comenzarían a debilitarse, en medio de la mesa de diálogo que estableció el presidente de centro Rodrigo Paz con distintas organizaciones campesinas y de trabajadores. Pero los grupos más combativos no parecen dispuestos a ceder.

«¿Qué queremos? !Que renuncie!, ¿Cuándo? ¡Ahora!», gritaban los manifestantes, que detonaron petardos mientras bajaban hacia La Paz. Cuando quisieron llegar hasta la Plaza Murillo, donde se encuentra el Palacio Quemado, antigua sede de la presidencia, chocaron con el cerco policial. La batalla se extendió a lo largo de varias cuadras.

Poco antes, la policía había cortado el tránsito en un amplio perímetro desde la Avenida 16 de Julio (El Prado como lo llaman aquí), y cientos de personas se alejaban de la zona, en una escena casi calcada de las que se vivieron aquí desde el lunes pasado, cuando la violencia se desmadró y generó gran alarma no sólo en Bolivia sino a nivel regional.

Advertisement

Los enfrentamientos, como el viernes pasado en el mismo lugar, duraron poco más de una hora. Luego de las corridas y las detonaciones que se oían a varias cuadras de distancia, el centro de la ciudad parecía volver a vaciarse. Pero en todas las avenidas se nota una fuerte presencia policial.

Rodrigo Paz insiste en el diálogo pero con límites

En un acto en la ciudad de Sucre, que este lunes 25 de Mayo celebraba una fecha histórica, el presidente, que lleva apenas seis meses en el poder, volvió a tender la mano a los grupos más moderados que le exigen que cumpla con sus promesas de campaña.

Advertisement

Después de un fin de semana de herméticas reuniones con organizaciones sociales, con la mediación de la Iglesia Católica, Paz insistió en dialogar con los sectores movilizados para buscar una salida al conflicto. Especialmente, para que levanten los piquetes. El operativo militar y policial enviado el sábado para liberar las rutas terminó en enfrentamientos y fracaso.

Paz dijo que Bolivia «no necesita el conflicto» y que hay que dialogar, «pero no bajo la presión del hambre de los ciudadanos como escudo o la falta de combustible y medicina», problemas que están afectando sobre todo a la ciudad de La Paz.

«No voy a dialogar con los que no dialogan, porque esos no entienden de la libertad. Hemos apostado por el diálogo por más de 11 días y estamos apostando por los resultados», agregó en su discurso en Sucre, a primera hora de la mañana, antes de los enfrentamientos del mediodía en La Paz.

Advertisement

La ola de protestas se desató a comienzos de mayo con un llamado a huelga de la Central Obrera Boliviana (COB), el mayor sindicato del país, y cortes de rutas que ya son más de 50 en distintos puntos del país, en reclamo de mejoras salariales y en rechazo a la política económica de Paz, que acusan de neoliberal.

Los bloqueos provocaron un grave desabastecimiento de combustibles, que este lunes era bien claro en La Paz: no sólo siguen las largas filas en las estaciones de servicio -muchas están directamente cerradas porque no tienen nafta ni diésel- sino que circulan muchos menos transportes. Además, durante días fue una odisea conseguir pollo, carne, huevos y algunos vegetales.

Poco a poco los alimentos comenzaron a llegar, aunque en cantidades menores a las habituales, lo que ha disparado los precios. Consumidores y comerciantes se quejan desde hace días y reclaman al gobierno una solución, porque están causando graves daños a los pequeños y medianos vendedores, además de los problemas para las familias.

Advertisement

El oxígeno medicinal que empezaba a escasear en los hospitales poco a poco está llegando y ha bajado un poco la preocupación. Pero lo que siente aquí en las calles, en los medios y entre diferentes analistas políticos con los que conversó Clarín, es el hartazgo con esta situación y un creciente malestar con un gobierno al que se percibe débil.

Desde varios sectores de la derecha reclaman al presidente que decrete un estado de excepción, pero el gobierno se niega por temor a atizar aún más el fuego.

«Este gobierno ha cometido muchas fallas desde que asumió. No ha habido suficiente transparencia sobre sus planes. La gente se aguantó la quita de los subsidios a los combustibles, y el aumento de los precios a más del doble. Pero luego esa venta de gasolina sucia fue terrible», señaló a esta enviada el sociólogo y analista político Ricardo Paz Ballivian.

Advertisement

Se refería a la distribución por parte del Estado de un combustible de mala calidad -o contaminado, según se está investigando- que destruyó los motores de cientos de vehículos, en particular las camionetas de transporte público.

Eso desató la furia de muchos trabajadores. «Y las reivindicaciones legítimas se han encontrado con sectores políticos sediciosos, que han alimentado este fuego. Son minorías con una gran capacidad de violencia», agregó el analista.

¿Cómo se sale de esta encrucijada? «Es posible que el gobierno tenga que hacer muchas concesiones y que salga muy debilitado», interpretó Paz Ballivian.

Advertisement

alistas, políticos y ciudadanos de a pie apuestan a que las protestas vayan bajando su intensidad. Pero no resultará sencillo apaciguar en el corto plazo la furia contenida.

Continue Reading

INTERNACIONAL

Pope Leo warns AI risks becoming tool of ‘domination, exclusion and death’ in new encyclical

Published

on


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Pope Leo unveiled the Vatican’s new encyclical, «Magnifica Humanitas,» warning that artificial intelligence risks becoming a tool of «domination, exclusion and death» unless governments and institutions place moral limits on the rapidly developing technology.

Advertisement

The Vatican is formally entering the global debate over artificial intelligence as governments and tech companies race to develop increasingly powerful AI systems with limited international regulation.

The pontiff invoked Pope Leo XIII’s 1891 encyclical «Rerum Novarum,» which addressed worker exploitation during the Industrial Revolution, arguing that AI represents a similarly transformative moment threatening human dignity.

«Today we find ourselves facing a transformation of similar magnitude, with perhaps even greater consequences,» the Pope said.

Advertisement

UN REVISITS ‘KILLER ROBOT’ REGULATIONS AS CONCERNS ABOUT AI-CONTROLLED WEAPONS GROW

Pope Leo warns artificial intelligence could become a force for «domination, exclusion and death» without moral limits in the Vatican’s new encyclical. (Alberto PIZZOLI / AFP via Getty Images)

The pope warned about increasingly autonomous weapons systems that are beyond meaningful human control. He also said AI systems could block access to healthcare, employment and security because of biased data. He compared AI governance to nuclear arms control.

Advertisement

«Like nuclear energy, it must be at the service of all and of the common good,» he said.

AI layoffs may be backfiring on companies

Pope Leo XIV leading a vigil inside St. Peter's Basilica at the Vatican

Pope Leo XIV leads a vigil for peace inside St. Peter’s Basilica at the Vatican on April 11, 2026. (Gregorio Borgia/AP)

The pope said disarming AI alone is not enough and called on governments and institutions to «build» systems rooted in trust and human dignity. Recalling devastating floods in Peru, he said rebuilding means restoring trust and hope.

Advertisement

WHY A CLASSICAL EDUCATION MAY BE THE KEY TO HUMANITY’S FUTURE IN THE AI ERA

Pope Leo XIV leading Angelus prayer from window of Apostolic Palace at the Vatican

Pope Leo XIV leads the Angelus prayer from the window of the Apostolic Palace at the Vatican on March 1, 2026, warning that escalating violence in the Middle East risks becoming an «irreparable abyss.» (REUTERS/Guglielmo Mangiapane)

The pope also laid out the church’s broader argument about humanity and technology.

«The person bears within him- or herself a freedom, an interiority and a vocation to love and worship that no machine can replace,» he said.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The Vatican is attempting to insert moral theology into a largely secular technological arms race.

«Stay awake,» the pope urged, warning humanity not to surrender moral judgment to machines.

Advertisement



artificial intelligence, pope francis, religion, roman catholic, vatican

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tendencias