INTERNACIONAL
House avoids unprecedented four-member expulsion week as Swalwell and Gonzales resign instead

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
It may have been possible to bequeath this as «expulsion week.»
Instead, this might be «resignation week.»
The House has only expelled six Members in the history of the republic. But it was possible as recently as Monday that the House was primed to wrestle with a mind-boggling four expulsions.
It takes a two-thirds vote to expel a Member. The House last expelled one of its own in late 2023: former Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.). Before that, you have to go back to 2002 when the House kicked out late Rep. Jim Traficant (D-Ohio).
5TH ACCUSER COMES FORWARD AGAINST REP ERIC SWALWELL AHEAD OF EXPECTED RESIGNATION
Here was the chopping block:
Calls to expel former Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) piled up after reports surfaced that he sexually assaulted a former aide and several other women. Swalwell initially said he would fight the allegations. Then he dropped his bid to become governor of California after a host of once close allies abandoned their support. Swalwell has now resigned, avoiding the ignominious scene of an expulsion.
Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., appeared on MS NOW 26 times and on CNN 24 times in 2026 alone, according to the Media Research Center. (Ronaldo Bolaños/Getty Images)
Then there was former Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-Texas). At first, Gonzales denied an affair with an aide who committed suicide by setting herself on fire. Gonzales was locked in a tough primary runoff against Republican Congressional candidate Brandon Herrera. But after pressure, Gonzales finally dropped out of the runoff and isn’t standing for re-election. However, Gonzales intended to stay on until his term expired on January 3 next year. But now Gonzales is out the door, too.
TWO DEMOCRATIC REPS CALL FOR SWALWELL TO EXIT CONGRESS AS CONTROVERSY SWIRLS AROUND HIS BID FOR CA GOVERNOR
So two down, two to go.
This is where things grow complicated.
Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D-Fla.) could face expulsion soon. In late March, the House Ethics Committee held a rare «trial,» declaring she improperly obtained an astonishing $5 million in COVID relief funds. The Ethics panel will likely recommend a punishment for Cherfilus-McCormick next week. The full House doesn’t have to consider or adhere to the prescribed discipline. The congresswoman proclaims her innocence. She faces a criminal trial in Florida in February 2027.
WHY ERIC SWALWELL WAS FORCED TO QUIT CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR’S RACE AFTER SEXUAL MISCONDUCT ALLEGATIONS
«The facts are indisputable at this point and so I believe it will be the consensus of this body that she should be expelled,» forecast House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.).

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said lawmakers should expel Rep. Sheila Cherfilius-McCormick, D-Fla., after a House ethics panel found her guilty of more than 25 ethics violations. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images; Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
Rep. Greg Stuebe (R-Fla.) filed a resolution to bounce Cherfilus-McCormick from the body a few months ago.
And for the Republicans, there’s Rep. Cory Mills (R-Fla.). Mills is accused of «stolen valor» and exaggeration of his military record. But what triggered the current expulsion push is an allegation that the congressman struck his girlfriend in early 2025. A judge imposed a restraining order against Mills. However, police never charged the congressman. The Ethics Committee is also investigating whether he violated federal campaign rules. But the formal ethics probe of the Florida Republican isn’t as far along as the Cherfilus-McCormick inquiry.
SWALWELL RESIGNATION COLLIDES WITH CHINA-LINKED SCANDAL AS CRITICS DEMAND FILE RELEASE
Johnson is mindful of that fact.
«With regard to Mills, I’m not sure the status of the Ethics Committee investigation and that’s one of the things I’ll be looking into today,» said Johnson.
Four troubled Members. Two Democrats and two Republicans. It was that parity which may have primed the House to take the unprecedented step of expelling those four Members before Swalwell and Gonzales announced their resignations. But a push to expel Cherfiulus-McCormick and not Mills creates a host of problems in the House.
GONZALES HIT WITH EXPULSION VOTE THREAT AHEAD OF EXPECTED RESIGNATION
It’s about the math.
The House swore-in Rep. Clay Fuller (R-Ga.) on Monday night. Fuller won a special election last week to succeed former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) who resigned. That GOP gain is likely offset by an anticipated victory by Democratic Congressional candidate Analilia Mejia in a Thursday special election in New Jersey. This is a Democratic seat which has been vacant since New Jersey Gov. and former Congresswoman Mikie Sherill (D) resigned from the House last fall.

Republican congressional candidate Clay Fuller, left, speaks next to President Donald Trump, during a visit to the Coosa Steel Corporation in Rome, Georgia, Feb. 19, 2026. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)
With Swalwell and Gonzales out and Fuller in, the current breakdown is 431 Members: 217 Republicans and 213 Democrats. Rep. Kevin Kiley (I-Calif.) dropped his affiliation with the GOP. The addition of Fuller and presumed win by Meija would make the breakdown 217 to 214 and one independent – with one vacancy, covering 432 Members. After the Swalwell and Gonzales resignations, the remaining open seat is a solidly Republican district in northern California, long held by late Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-Calif.). He died in January.
ERIC SWALWELL WAS CABLE NEWS STAR FOR YEARS BEFORE RAPID FALL FROM GRACE
But what happens if the House moves against Cherfilus-McCormick and not Mills? That creates an imbalance between the parties – something which was lost when the potential expulsion of four Members was on the table.
«What about this issue of parity,» yours truly asked House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.).
«The issue of parity hasn’t been something that we’ve had a conversation about. We’ve been working through what’s in front of us today and that’s what we’re going to continue to do,» replied Jeffries.
LAWMAKERS PUT EXPULSION THREATS ATOP HOUSE AGENDA AS RETURN SETS UP HIGH-STAKES WEEK
I followed up.
«But isn’t that a concern, though, if they take action against Cherfilus-McCormick? Her ethics process is further along than Mr. Mills,» I asked.
«The ethics process is still incomplete and we’ll see what the Ethics Committee has to recommend next week,» replied Jeffries.
‘SMART DECISION’: SWALWELL’S RESIGNATION SPURS PRAISE FROM BOTH PARTIES AFTER BOMBSHELL ALLEGATIONS EMERGE
That’s in reference to the upcoming ethics panel meeting, recommending punishment for the Florida Democrat.
It was one thing if the House may have bounced four Members, two Republicans and two Democrats, all at once. But it’s dicier now that Gonzales and Swalwell stepped aside. It’s further complicated considering the uneven status of the ethics inquiries regarding Cherfilus-McCormick and Mills.

Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, D-Fla., speaks after being sworn in during a ceremony in the Broward County Commission chambers in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on Jan. 27, 2025. (Joe Cavaretta/South Florida Sun Sentinel/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)
It seems that Congress is now in a period of establishing new precedents on a regular basis. A record-breaking government shutdown – only superseded by another record-breaking government shutdown. In addition, the House is experiencing a dramatic increase in the raw number of «censures» which it doles out to Members. Censure is the second-highest mode of punishment in the House, just below expulsion.
JONATHAN TURLEY: ERIC SWALWELL’S ENABLERS KNEW THE TRUTH — AND PROTECTED HIM ANYWAY
The House censured late Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) in late 2010. Prior to that, the House last reprimanded late Reps. Gerry Studds (D-Mass.) and Daniel Crane (R-Ill.) in 1983. But since 2021, the House has censured five Members: Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.), Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) – when he served in the House – Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), former Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.) and Rep. Al Green (D-Texas).
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) recently characterized the censure explosion as the «political» weaponization of the ethics process.
It’s possible the House might not take any immediate action regarding Cherfilus-McCormick and Mills. Lawmakers from both sides may be more willing to expel one of their own – and maybe take one for the team on their side – if a similar outcome is guaranteed across the aisle.
SWALWELL’S FALL FROM GRACE SPARKS DEMOCRAT RUSH TO RETURN CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS AMID SCRUTINY
With such a tight majority, Republicans may not want to cede power to Democrats if the House expels a GOP Member as they try to cling to the majority. By the same token, it’s doubtful Democrats are willing to absorb a hit when they are within sneezing distance of the majority – if they don’t see a political equilibrium and document consequences for the Republican majority.
Moreover, tracking where the votes lie for disciplinary action is nearly impossible. What further complicates this is whether any expulsion motion actually comes to a true, up/down vote. There are often motions «to table» or kill any resolution to impose discipline against a Member. The same with motions «to refer» or dispatch allegations against a Member to the Ethics Committee for additional scrutiny. For instance, the Ethics panel is all but done probing Cherfilus-McCormick and is investigating Mills. So it’s unclear what would happen with any possible motion «to refer.»
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
And let’s be frank: some lawmakers either really want to be on the record voting to discipline one of their colleagues or want no part of it at all. Resolutions to sit in judgment of a colleague is one of the hardest votes lawmakers take. Right up with a vote to go to war. That’s why some prefer the political fig leaf of a «motion to refer» or «motion to table» to an actual up/down vote to punish one of their own.
So this could have been «expulsion week» on Capitol Hill. It’s certainly «resignation week.» And if there’s no other disciplinary action, some lawmakers will be resigned to that outcome.
politics, us, eric swalwell, congress, house of representatives politics, mike johnson
INTERNACIONAL
Pakistán anunció que Estados Unidos e Irán firmaron el acuerdo que pone fin a la Guerra en Medio Oriente

Estados Unidos e Irán firmaron el acuerdo que pone fin a la guerra en Medio Oriente, iniciada el 28 de febrero por el país norteamericano e Israel, uno de los conflictos más tensos de los últimos años en la región. Así lo anunció el primer ministro de Pakistán con un posteo en X.
“Tras intensas conversaciones, nos complace anunciar que el Acuerdo de Paz entre los Estados Unidos de América y la República Islámica de Irán ha sido ALCANZADO. Ambas partes han declarado la terminación inmediata y permanente de las operaciones militares en todos los frentes, incluido Líbano”, escribió el mandatario Shehbaz Sharif.
Después del anuncio, el precio del petróleo abrió con una caída del 5% en Estados Unidos.
En tanto, el presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, anunció que alcanzó un acuerdo con Irán para reabrir el estrecho de Ormuz tras más de tres meses de conflicto. Según afirmó, el paso marítimo se reabrirá tras la firma del acuerdo con Irán el viernes.
Desde Teherán, el viceministro de asuntos exteriores de Irán, Kazem Gharibabadi, declaró en la noche del domingo que al acuerdo con Estados Unidos pone “fin inmediatamente a la guerra”.
“En primer lugar, el fin inmediato y definitivo de la guerra y de las operaciones militares en los diferentes frentes, incluido el Líbano”, enumeró el diplomático, especialista en cuestiones jurídicas, en la televisión estatal.
El canciller iraní dijo que “el enemigo, que atacó para llevar a cabo sus designios malintencionados, ha visto todos sus objetivos reducidos a la nada, y la República Islámica de Irán ha logrado grandes victorias en esta guerra”, declaró a la televisión estatal iraní.
Irán dijo además que en un plazo de 60 días se iniciarán conversaciones para un “acuerdo final”.
Además, la agencia de noticias iraní Mers dijo que el memorando de entendimiento contempla el desembolso inmediato de 12.000 millones de dólares en activos congelados.
El documento prevé “el desbloqueo de 24.000 millones de dólares de activos iraníes congelados durante el período de negociación de 60 días” que se abre tras la conclusión del memorando de entendimiento, según Mehr. “La mitad de esta suma debe ponerse a disposición de Irán antes del inicio de las negociaciones”, precisó.
Qué dijo Donald Trump
En una publicación en su red social Truth Social, Trump explicó que, a cambio de la reapertura del estrecho, Estados Unidos levantará el bloqueo marítimo impuesto a la entrada y salida de buques en puertos iraníes.
“El acuerdo con la República Islámica de Irán ya está completo. ¡Felicitaciones a todos! Por la presente, autorizo plenamente la apertura sin peaje del estrecho de Ormuz y, simultáneamente, autorizo el levantamiento inmediato del bloqueo naval de Estados Unidos. ¡Buques del mundo, arranquen sus motores! ¡Que fluya el petróleo!“, escribió Trump, sin ofrecer más detalles del acuerdo. Un buque portacontenedores anclado, con un pequeño bote de motor en primer plano, en el estrecho de Ormuz frente a Bandar Abbas, Irán, el sábado 2 de mayo de 2026. (Amirhosein Khorgooi/ISNA vía AP)
Por el estratégico estrecho de Ormuz, por el que circula el 20% del petróleo mundial.
La tregua del 8 de abril había terminado con la mayoría de ataques directos entre Irán y Estados Unidos, aunque en los últimos días hubo una ofensiva cruzada entre ambos países.
Leé también: Conmoción en Ecuador: mataron a balazos a una fiscal que investigaba el crimen organizado
Poco antes, en un mensaje en su red Truth Social, dijo que la relación con Teherán es “muy diferente y mejor que la que tuvieron las administraciones anteriores”, con duras críticas a uno de sus antecesores, el demócrata, Barack Obama: “A diferencia de los cientos de miles de millones de dólares que Obama les pagó, incluyendo 1700 millones de dólares en efectivo, aquí no habrá intercambio de dinero».
El presidente de Estados Unidos dijo además que intervendrán sobre las reservas de uranio enriquecido iraníes: “En el momento oportuno, cuando todo esté en calma, entraremos y recuperaremos el polvo nuclear, enterrado en las profundidades de las imponentes montañas de granito sumergidas, gracias a nuestros magníficos bombarderos B-2 y sus brillantes pilotos, y lo desintegraremos y destruiremos, ya sea en Irán o en Estados Unidos».
Trump planteó: “Esperamos colaborar con Irán y con todo Oriente Medio durante muchos años. Ojalá este proceso se desarrolle de forma rápida, sencilla y sin contratiempos. Si no es así, tenemos la alternativa definitiva, ¡que esperamos no tener que volver a usar jamás!“.
Estados Unidos, Irán, Medio Oriente
INTERNACIONAL
Party Poopers’ Fight Card: Jane Fonda, ‘No Kings,’ communists roll out rival spectacle to Trump’s 250th

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
As President Donald Trump prepares to celebrate America’s 250th anniversary today with a UFC event at the White House, a national network of angry activists has assembled its own fight card: a celebrity concert headlined by Jane Fonda, hundreds of «watch parties,» local organizing events including a «RAGE AGAINST THE CAGE!» protest and a coordinated operation aimed at fighting Trump «through the midterm elections and beyond.»
About 400 organizations in the «No Kings» coalition with combined annual revenues of about $3 billion have organized Sunday’s nationwide protest operation. Internal planning documents obtained by Fox News Digital show organizers’ plan to using the concerts, watch parties and local gatherings to build momentum for a political organizing network.
President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office alongside UFC Freedom 250 fighters Ilia Topuria, Alex Pereira, Justin Gaethje, and Ciryl Gane at the White House on May 06, 2026 in Washington, DC. (Scott Taetsch/Zuffa LLC)
At 4 p.m., in one of day’s many planned sideshows, «Refuse Fascism,» a pro-communism group, plans its «RAGE AGAINST THE CAGE!» protest at McPherson Square near the White House. UFC fighter Sean Strickland released a video on social media, saying he had booked a ticket to protest at the White House for allegedly being cut from the main event for criticizing the state of Israel and the war in Iran. «Ill bring a bullhorn,» he wrote in his social media post.
Meanwhile, the Women’s March, a multi-millon-dollar nonprofit enterprise, has rented portable toilets that its staffers are setting up from noon to 6 p.m. at Farragut Square, blocks from the White House, for a protest dubbed «Dump on Trump.»

Sean Strickland appears on stage during the UFC 328 press conference at Prudential Center in Newark, N.J., on May 7, 2026. (Ed Mulholland/Zuffa LLC)
A 16-page «No Kings Event Host Toolkit» describes June 14 as an opportunity to convert mass demonstrations into local political infrastructure. Organizers frame the event as a counter to Trump’s hosting of the White House UFC event, saying «we will be doing the real work of democracy.» The materials describe watch parties as «strategic community gatherings designed to build deep local connections and lay the grassroots infrastructure we need to defend our rights through the midterm elections and beyond.»
Indivisible, a Democratic nonprofit funded by mega-donor George Soros, handed the headline role to the 88-year-old Fonda’s «Committee for the First Amendment,» which is hosting the day’s premiere counter-event in New York City at a 90-minute concert, «Rise Up, Sing Out: A Concert for the First Amendment,» starting at 7:30 pm. at a theater called «The Town Hall» on 43rd Street. This weekend, tickets in the orchestra section sold for $330.15.

Jane Fonda attends the closing ceremony red carpet at the 78th annual Cannes Film Festival at Palais des Festivals in Cannes, France, on May 24, 2025. (Gisela Schober/Getty Images)
JANE FONDA SLAMMED DEMOCRATIC LEADERS AS ‘NOT GOOD ENOUGH’ IN FIGHT AGAINST TRUMP
The «Committee for the First Amendment» describes itself as «a large collective of artists, storytellers, and cultural leaders» launched in October 2025 with about 500 leading figures from the entertainment industry. They invoked the name of a group established in 1947 by Hollywood celebrities, including Lauren Bacall, Frank Sinatra, Lucille Ball and Groucho Marx, to challenge Sen. Joe McCarthy’s investigations into the spread of communism in the U.S. and Hollywood. Later, some members of the original «Committee for the First Amendment» were identified as communist, and original members of the group wrote that they were duped into joining the effort. Ronald Reagan, then an actor, reportedly called committee member «suckers.»
Actor Humphrey Bogart even published a politically frank column, headlined, «I’m No Communist,» urging fellow celebrities not to be «used as dupes by Commie organizations.»
Fast forward to today, and the anti-Trump concert will feature left-wing activists including Fonda, whose controversial 1972 trip to communist North Vietnam earned her the nickname «Hanoi Jane» and sparked backlash from critics who accused her of aligning with the North Vietnamese communist regime during the Vietnam War. She’s scheduled to be joined in New York City by 1970s «godmother of punk» Patti Smith, actress Bette Midler, singer Rufus Wainwright, singer Sasha Allen, former MSNBC host Joy Reid and actor Wilson Cruz.

Lauren Bacall embraces and kisses Humphrey Bogart in a scene from the 1944 film «To Have and Have Not.» (Warner Brothers/Getty Images)
JANE FONDA WARNS AMERICA FACES ‘EXISTENTIAL’ CRISIS AS SHE URGES TURNOUT AT ‘NO KINGS’ PROTESTS
Organizers describe the event as «an uplifting evening of song, solidarity, and action» celebrating freedoms of «speech, religion, press, assembly, and protest.»
But the internal planning documents reviewed by Fox News Digital show the concert is the public-facing component of a much broader anti-Trump organizing effort designed to be a funneling agent for «the midterm elections and beyond.»
The day’s messaging guidance casts the June 14 showdown as an alternative political narrative of «people power.»
«The lead-up to America’s 250th is a test of who we are,» the guidance goes. «President Trump is choosing self-promotion. We’re choosing community, participation and people power.»
Organizers repeatedly frame the effort as direct counterprogramming to Trump’s event. One suggested message prepared for supporters states: «On June 14, President Trump hosts a UFC cage fight at the White House. The main event will be in our living rooms.»
The «No Kings» coalition’s internal materials outline an extensive organizing apparatus. Host toolkits instruct local organizers to recruit co-hosts, appoint «greeters» and safety leads, collect attendee contact information, identify future organizers and schedule follow-up organizing meetings after the concert.
One host guide tells organizers their goal is to «bring people in and move them to ongoing participation.» Another instructs hosts to determine «who might help you with organizing moving forward.» Before attendees leave, organizers are directed to create «a clearly defined plan» and schedule another organizing meeting within two weeks.
Taken together, the documents show an effort focused not merely on a single day of protest but on building durable activist networks after June 14.
The coalition’s messaging guidance makes that objective explicit. One recommended talking point states: «He wants attention. We’re building a movement.»
At the same time, organizers stress legal compliance and message discipline.
The protests include a «reimbursement» program, and the material explicitly states that it’s administered through Indivisible Civics, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit. In a departure from the clearly partisan nature of «No Kings» protests that have as an underlying theme that Trump is «a king,» the guidance for today states that events «cannot include lobbying or partisan political activity.»
The reimbursement material reveals for the first time that participating groups may receive up to $500 in reimbursements for watch parties connected to the event.

Jane Fonda and Rep. Ilhan Omar appear onstage during the No Kings Rallies in St. Paul, Minn., on March 28, 2026. (Adam Bettcher/Getty Images)
FIRST ON FOX: POWERFUL HOUSE WAYS AND MEANS CHAIR THROWS HAMMER DOWN ON ‘FOREIGN-ALIGNED INFLUENCE NETWORK’
The guidance further states that event’s can’t be «co-hosted with any political party or partisan organization» or «feature candidates running for elected office.» The document also specifies that the program «cannot reimburse expenses from political rallies or protests (e.g. ‘No Kings’) or events hosted to prep for those activities.»
The politics has been very thinly veiled. At the last «No Kings» protest in St. Paul, Minn., just like with earlier rallies, organizers, including Fonda, openly embraced Democratic politicians like Rep. Ilhan Omar, without any Republican lawmakers around.
Organizers emphasized strict commitment to a «NONVIOLENCE CLAUSE.» One host guide warns: «DO NOT DELETE THE NONVIOLENCE CLAUSE. Your event will not be approved without this language.»
Beyond the celebrity headliners, the campaign’s leadership network overlaps with activists and organizations that have been the subject of congressional inquiries for their alleged ties to the Chinese Communist Party.
Documents released by the House Ways and Means Committee show that attorney Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, executive director of the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund, a Washington, D.C., nonprofit, represents the People’s Forum, a nonprofit that has received millions of dollars Neville Roy Singham, an American businessman and self-described Marxist who lives in Shanghai, supporting the Chinese Communist Party. According to her official biography, Verheyden-Hilliard also serves on the steering committee of Fonda’s «Committee for the First Amendment.» Verheyden-Hilliard hasn’t respond to requests for comment from Fox News Digital.
The operation is also supported by a professional communications infrastructure. Press inquiries for «Rise Up, Sing Out» are directed to Sunshine Sachs Morgan & Lylis, a prominent New York-based public-relations firm known as «SSM&L.» The organization created many of the planning documents for the New York City headline event, its name on the metadata of several documents. The PR company didn’t respond to a request for comment.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
politics, world protests, congress, political, ufc
INTERNACIONAL
EN VIVO | El acuerdo de paz entre EEUU e Irán será firmado el próximo viernes 19 de junio en Ginebra

Después de mucha expecativa, el primer ministro de Pakistán, Shehbaz Sharif, anunció este domingo que Estados Unidos e Irán llegaron a un “acuerdo de paz” que detiene de inmediato todas las operaciones militares en Medio Oriente, incluído el Líbano.
De acuerdo a lo detallado por Sharif, la firma del pacto tendrá lugar en Ginebra el próximo 19 de junio.
“Con el acuerdo ya en vigor, los mediadores facilitarán una serie de reuniones esta semana. Estos debates previos a la implementación sentarán las bases para las conversaciones técnicas y la ceremonia oficial de firma”, escribió en X el mandatario paquistaní, mediador clave entre Washington y Teherán.
Apenas minutos después, el presidente Donald Trump anunció que el acuerdo negociado con Irán “ya está completo” y ordenó la reapertura inmediata del estrecho de Ormuz y el levantamiento del bloqueo naval estadounidense que permanecía vigente en la región.
En las próximas horas el presidente norteamericano viajará a Francia para participar del G7, en Evián, por lo que hay expectativa por su posible presencia el viernes en Suiza para ser él quien firme acuerdo.
A continuación, la cobertura minuto a minuto de la nueva coyuntura en Medio Oriente:
Nuevo mensaje de Trump
Momentos después del anuncio del acuerdo con Irán, el presidente Trump volvió a usar sus redes sociales para destacar la gestión de su administración, y afirmó que este pacto traerá “paz” a Medio Oriente.
“Este gran acuerdo traerá paz y seguridad a toda la región”, sostuvo en su mensaje publicado en Truth Social.
“Muchos presidentes han intentado alcanzar la paz con Irán, y todos han fracasado antes que yo. Los líderes de la región han encontrado, por primera vez, a un presidente que puede ayudarles a lograr una paz verdadera. Con la apertura del estrecho tras la firma del acuerdo el viernes, con el fin de retirar las minas, ¡el petróleo volverá a fluir por ambos extremos para la región y para el mundo!“.
Irán dice que el acuerdo pone fin a la guerra
El viceministro de asuntos exteriores del régimen iraní, Kazem Gharibabadi, declaró en la noche del domingo que el acuerdo con Estados Unidos pone “fin inmediatamente a la guerra”.
“En primer lugar, el fin inmediato y definitivo de la guerra y de las operaciones militares en los diferentes frentes, incluido el Líbano”, señaló el diplomático, especialista en cuestiones jurídicas, en la televisión estatal.
Asimismo, afirmó que Teherán salió vencedor de la guerra con Israel y Estados Unidos: “El enemigo, que atacó para llevar a cabo sus designios malintencionados, ha visto todos sus objetivos reducidos a la nada, y la República Islámica de Irán ha logrado grandes victorias en esta guerra”.
Macron dijo que el acuerdo será tratado en el G7
Las grandes potencias del G7 discutirán a partir del lunes en Evian, Francia, las “consecuencias” del acuerdo entre Estados Unidos e Irán y la reapertura del estrecho de Ormuz, dijo el domingo el presidente Emmanuel Macron.
“El objetivo será ver las consecuencias de este acuerdo, el apoyo al Líbano, la reapertura del estrecho de Ormuz a largo plazo y, obviamente, la conclusión de un acuerdo sobre el programa nuclear y balístico en Irán”, dijo el mandatario francés en un video publicado en su Instagram.
Macron recibirá el lunes en la ciudad a orillas del lago Lemán a Donald Trump y a los líderes de Alemania, Canadá, Italia, Japón y Reino Unido.
JD Vance asistirá a la firma del acuerdo en Suiza
El vicepresidente norteamericano declaró este domingo que tenía previsto asistir a la firma del acuerdo de paz con Irán en Suiza dentro de unos días, pero que el presidente Donald Trump podría acudir.
“Sin duda tengo previsto estar allí, pero es posible que el propio presidente también acuda”, declaró a Fox News cuando se le preguntó si estaría presente en la ceremonia, que, según el mediador Pakistán, tendrá lugar en Ginebra el 19 de junio.

El presidente de Estados Unidos, Donald Trump, anunció este domingo que el acuerdo negociado con Irán “ya está completo” y ordenó reapertura inmediata del estrecho de Ormuz y el levantamiento del bloqueo naval estadounidense que permanecía vigente en la región.
El primer ministro de Pakistán, Shehbaz Sharif, anunció este domingo que Estados Unidos e Irán alcanzaron un acuerdo de paz para poner fin al conflicto que enfrentó a ambos países durante los últimos meses y que la firma oficial del documento está prevista para el próximo 19 de junio en Suiza.
Diplomacy / Foreign Policy
POLITICA3 días agoSe viralizó un tuit en el que Adorni contaba que en 2018 le habían cortado la luz por falta de pago
POLITICA2 días agoDiputados de la Coalición Cívica denunciaron penalmente a Manuel Adorni por presuntas irregularidades en sus declaraciones juradas
ECONOMIA2 días agoJan De Nul defendió el proceso de licitación de la Hidrovía con una carta a las principales entidades vinculadas a la vía navegable
















